Terrorism by Israel and NATO

The failure of the City of Nagasaki to invite Israel on Nagasaki Atomic Bomb Day, August 9, has caused a stir in japan, the United States, and other major NATO countries, which have absent their ambassadors.
The NATO side protested that Nagasaki City did not invite Israel along with Russia and Belarus.
NATO claims that Israel's attack on Palestine was in defense of terrorism by Hamas, and is different from Russia's aggression in Ukraine.
So what about Israel's acts of terrorism?
On July 31, Hamas supreme leader Ismail Haniya was assassinated in Tehran.
On July 3, Hezbollah commander Muhammad Nahma Nasser was assassinated in southern Lebanon.
Although no official announcement has been made, all of these assassinations are believed to have been carried out by Israel.
Furthermore, in the case of Ismail Haniyah's assassination, the perpetrator entered another country and committed the crime, making it a complete terrorist attack.
In addition, Ismail Haniyah was the target of a cease-fire agreement between Israel and Hamas, so Israel is to be blamed in a double sense.
Above all, what is NATO's response to the reality that Israeli attacks have killed many civilians in Gaza, with some 40,000 deaths?
At the very earliest stage, Israel's attacks are completely beyond the scope of defense.
After all, for NATO, Europe and the United States are at the center.
Recently, the Japanese government has been trying to deepen relations with NATO from a security perspective, but it is highly doubtful that NATO will live up to its expectations.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)